
CINCINNATI (AP) -- A Mansfield judge should be able to display the Ten Commandments in his courtroom because they have a secular significance as the foundation for some modern laws, his attorney told a federal appeals court Friday.
Lawyer Frank Manion said a lower court erred last year when it ordered Richland County Common Pleas Judge James DeWeese to remove a framed poster of the commandments. Manion argued the Ten Commandments do not have a strictly religious significance.
Raymond Vasvari, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, argued the Ten Commandments are a religious document and displaying them in a courtroom implies government endorsement of religion.
U.S. District Judge Kathleen O'Malley ruled in June 2002 that posting the commandments was unconstitutional ``because the debate he (DeWeese) seeks to foster is inherently religious in character.''
The three-judge panel of the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals did not say when it will rule.
Posted 3:30pm, Friday, October 31, 2003
Comments Terms of Use: We welcome your participation in our community. Please keep your comments civil and on point. Notify us of any inappropriate comments by clicking the “Mark as Offensive” link. You must be at least 13 years of age to post comments. By submitting a comment, you agree to these
Terms of Service
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login or register See all comments |